My mother would always just say “Fine then, don’t eat”, and then I’d get hungry later and she’d say that’s just too bad
“If you don’t eat you’ll regret it!”
“Slippery slope.”
For me it was “Fine then, dont eat” and i wouldnt eat anything
" I own you, have absolute authority over you and don’t care about your opinion of it"
“Oh a forum mod”
AMAB
Even lemm.ee’s mods? That sucks.
deleted by creator
Appeal to emotion fallacy.
No one said they’d be sad about it.
She’s about to break both his arms.
Then he’ll need his mommy.
I detect the fallacist’s fallacy.
What about the phallus’s fallacy?
it’s pro hoc, not cum hoc. which is to not say that it is not objectively, very funny.
I think you might mean “post hoc…” which is a more specific case of “cum hoc…” and sets focus on time/order of events
In this case, then, it would be pro hoc, since the crankiness comes after the not eating.
Right?
I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?
Yeah, that’s what I mean.
The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.
deleted by creator
