• viking@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It says not to leave “subjective bad reviews”. As in, objectively bad is fine.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        We just have a give a positive spin

        “The game is really good at sucking”

        “This game would definitely win an honorary award for ‘Games I don’t Care About’”

        “This Christmas I would gift the game to all my cousins whom I hate”

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s going to be relentlessly compared to OverWatch. It’s basically an OverWatch clone with Marvel characters.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not being able to make satirical comments about any game-related material would mean nobody could say something like, “Controlling Iron Man feels like fighting Jarvis for control of the suit”, or “Storm is as effective as a light breeze”

      • Konraddo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        My understanding is that Digital Foundry type of performance review is fine, but comments on how the control feels laggy or the game is a lower-tier copycat of Overwatch are not okay.

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        In the context of a game, let’s say a clearly outdated graphics engine that everyone can agree on looks very dated. Or game-stopping bugs. Constant crashes. Etc.