• KevonLooney@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, but they didn’t have game theory then. Democracy was kind of new too. Basically all non-monarchists were allies, because they literally had to fight actual kings to rule themselves.

    It’s not the founders’ fault that they didn’t foresee all future problems. They included the ability to amend the Constitution. It’s our fault for not doing that. Originalism makes no sense because the founders wanted us to change what they had done and improve it.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not the founders’ fault that they didn’t foresee all future problems. They included the ability to amend the Constitution. It’s our fault for not doing that. Originalism makes no sense because the founders wanted us to change what they had done and improve it.

      The Founding Fathers: “We’re not gods or kings. That’s literally the opposite of what we fought for.”

      Originalists: “OMG God-King Founding Daddies pls rule me from beyond the grave”

      • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Hmm isn’t this 40k as well?

        The Emperor of Man: “Gods don’t exist, use logic and science!”

        The Imperium of Man: “All hail the God-Emperor, where are the 1000 sacrifices?”

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      A lot also said every 20 years the Constitution needed rewritten, because expecting such a powerful document to remain relevant over such a long period of time was unthinkable to them…

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes and no.

      The Founding Fathers created the State in a manner that supported their interests, hence why it structurally supported wealthy Capitalists and slave owning white men most of all.

      Over time, this has been amended, Black Americans were emancipated and every citizen can vote now, including women, but only via constant struggle against the system.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That doesn’t relate to my comment or the original post. It’s like you’re trying to shoehorn in your own ideas about class war into the conversation.

        In return, I would like to add add that George Washington did not have wooden teeth. In fact, he had weird Frankenstein dentures made up of a bunch of other different teeth. This supports my pro dental care ideas.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          It absolutely relates. The two party system is a symptom of designing a system to bend but never break, and retain control of the people who made the system.

          Believe it or not, human history is the history of class struggle. It isn’t at all unrelated to how wealthy Capitalists designed a state to retain their power.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            No, human history is the history of struggle against tooth decay. If you disagree, you are a tool of the anti-dentites.