• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    PlayStation Portal is the ideal device for gamers in households where they may need to share their living room TV or simply want to play PS5 games in another room of the house.

    Okay I can see there being a niche there, mom and dad want to watch a movie but Jr wants to play games. I don’t know if that’s a huge market, but okay

    According to the description, PlayStation Portal is only a Remote Play device and will not allow access to cloud streaming of games on PlayStation Plus Premium. As a result, in order for the PlayStation Portal to function properly, players must own PS5 hardware.

    This however seems like a massive lost opportunity. Like Steam Link I assume you could choose which device to stream from, and with companies being huge on the “reoccurring revenue” train this seems like it could have added a ton of value to the device and at the same time increased their subscriptions. It would have gone from a “at home only toy for a niche market” to “pretty much anyone who has a PS5 at home and/or travels”

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve used remote play to play a casual / non-story game while watching Sports or some other background noise show on my TV more times than I can count. This is perfect for me.

    • yads@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are definitely times when either my kids or my wife is watching something and I’d rather be gaming so I think I’d probably use something like this. However, last time I tried a remote play solution from Sony the lag was brutal, so I’m a bit skeptical.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can one use the cloud streaming via their PS5?

      Edit: also I don’t think it’s that niche. I see this being a common occurrence in any household with only one high end TV and more than one person who wants to use it. The price point isn’t much more than a controller and a screen to begin with. They should sell the remote play hardware without the screen (just hdmi out) and controller (just include a bluetooth chip to allow controller pairing) at a lower price point to appeal to a wider market (cause portability in the household seems less useful, but just using another TV seems more common)

      • Aielman15@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It certainly is a common occurrence, but I don’t see many households dropping another $200 on top of the cost of the PS5. If this existed back in the days, my parents would have told me to either play something else/go outside, or move the console to my room.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Kids aren’t the only ones with gaming consoles. And I already countered the idea of putting a console on a different TV.

          Again, the price point may be high, but it’s literally not much more than the cost of a screen plus a controller.