cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15691030

As you can easily notice, today many open source projects are using some services, that are… sus.

For example, Github is the most popular place to store your project code and we all know, who owns it. And not to forget that sketchy AI training on every line of your code. Don’t we have alternatives? Oh, yes we have. Gitlab, Codeberg, Notabug, etc. You can even host your own Gitea or Forgejo instance if you want.

Also, Crowdin is very popular in terms of software (and docs) translation. Even Privacy Guides and The New Oil use Crowdin, even though we have FLOSS Weblate, that you can easily self-host or use public instances.

So, my question is: if you are building a FLOSS / privacy related project, why using proprietary and privacy invasive tools?

  • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
    19·
    6 months ago

    The biggest factor to me is developer attention. I had a project on gitlab and pushed a README.md with a link to the gitlab instance into github. I got about 10 times more reactions from github, incl. PRs (where the person had grabbed the code from gitlab and did a PR on github anyway) – even in this setup. Mirroring a project to github tilts that even further.

    Not being present on github means a lot less users and contributors. As long as that stays this way there is no way around github.

    I hope federated forges can move some attention away from github, making other forges more visible… but I am not too optimistic :-(

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      5·
      6 months ago

      Running my large project on gitlab I have no shortage of contributors, just painful sometimes to get people to register on gitlab due to account verification with credit card or phone number

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        5·
        6 months ago

        GitLab has gone downhill over the past several years to the point I cannot recommend it anymore. Rewuiring a credit card is a kick to the face of younger devs wanting to get their feet wet in open source. The CI minutes that free accounts and FOSS projects get is insultingly pathetic. Their open source program that you have to apply for is intentionally annoying, requiring you to manually get re-approved yearly and the benefits only work for FOSS projects under a group, not a personal account. It’s tolerable if you self-host your own runners and forget their shit excuse for a managed CI exists, but I’m also running into this super annoying issue where I get signed out of Gitlab almost daily and have to re-login and enter a verification code from my email. I have my project mirrored to Codeberg and if Codeberg had better CI I’d move completely, even if it were self hosted. Gitlab has gone way downhill since I moved to them after MS bought Github.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          1·
          6 months ago

          As an open source project via gitlab’s program we get 50000 minutes each year. That’s 4000-5000 merge requests of CI time for us. How many do you need? Odd that you get signed out every day.

          • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
            2·
            6 months ago

            I don’t want to move my project to a group, which is the only way to use those minutes. It used to be that any public project with a FOSS license got access to the FOSS minutes but now only the ones they approve do, and as I said, there are restrictions like having to have the project under a group. At least gitlab-runner is self hostable, but it’s a depressing mess compared to what it used to be.

      • Tobias Hunger@programming.dev
        4·
        6 months ago

        I never said that you can not run a project elsewhere, my point is that you will get way more interaction on github.

        Try pushing your project to github and compare the interactions you get from both forges.