I don’t think my lurking counts as breaking the rules, I’m just fulfilling my commitment late.

      • clubb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pretty sure the US law doesn’t even understand that. Don’t they have 2nd amendament rights?

        • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          6 months ago

          Citizens united and some other cases mean that:

          • Cooperations have first amendment rights
          • Donating money is a form of speech protected by the first amendment
          • therefore bribery is legal as long as it goes through PACs and is not obviously quid pro quo
          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            They don’t have the right to emancipation though. Like they are literally chattel. Weird how that part of personhood was overlooked, almost like the law was made ad-hoc to give their owners as much power as possible and not according to any real set of principles.

            • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Corporate personhood is mostly for convenience. Otherwise a company would need an individual to buy and sell corporate property, and they would have to rearrange stuff like that whenever that person dies, retires, or does something else that restricts property use. And it means an individual wouldn’t be able to be a tyrant for everyone else working at the company just because everything is in their name.

              Importantly, it makes it much easier for customers to sue, since they only need to show the company wronged them in some way rather than an individual being personally responsible. Usually they would have no way of knowing who makes which decisions and has which responsibilities, and by suing the company as a whole. they don’t have to. The same applies for governments, police departments, school boards, etc.

  • soba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s just something so pathetic about failing to start your dream company called X in 1999, and then twenty years later when your ultra rich buying some other company and renaming it X to try and finally feel like you won, you did it, you made a globally important social media company called x. The struggle is over. At last.

  • Vespair@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    6 months ago

    Small brain: Calling it X

    Big brain: Calling it twitter

    Galaxy brain: Not acknowledging that shithole at all

  • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve been known to deadname the one true church. Joseph Smith named it the Church of Christ, but the Mormon church is going through its little phase 💅 and insists on being called, and get this, no abbreviations allowed,

    The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.