I don’t think my lurking counts as breaking the rules, I’m just fulfilling my commitment late.

  • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    They don’t have the right to emancipation though. Like they are literally chattel. Weird how that part of personhood was overlooked, almost like the law was made ad-hoc to give their owners as much power as possible and not according to any real set of principles.

    • KombatWombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Corporate personhood is mostly for convenience. Otherwise a company would need an individual to buy and sell corporate property, and they would have to rearrange stuff like that whenever that person dies, retires, or does something else that restricts property use. And it means an individual wouldn’t be able to be a tyrant for everyone else working at the company just because everything is in their name.

      Importantly, it makes it much easier for customers to sue, since they only need to show the company wronged them in some way rather than an individual being personally responsible. Usually they would have no way of knowing who makes which decisions and has which responsibilities, and by suing the company as a whole. they don’t have to. The same applies for governments, police departments, school boards, etc.