• RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          This might be controversial, but the new Denis Villeneuve movies are much better than the book. Maybe watch the movies and read the book or trawl the wiki after for more context.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’d compare it to The Lord of the Rings books vs the movies. The Movies are a great abridged series and they know what pacing is, but the books explain so much more and have several extra movies worth of cut content.

          • Platypus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            They’re definitely better entertainment pound-for-pound. I’d contend that the book gives you a lot more to think about, so it really depends what you’re after. I like them both a lot–I think they complement each other very nicely.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some aspects of it. “The voice” is basically jedi mind tricks. People that are attuned also get visions/senses of foreboding about the future. There’s no telekinetic stuff as far as I know.

    • Fermion@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It definitely has aspects that could be considered magic, but I wouldn’t necessarily compare them to the Force.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No. But it has drugs that make you accurately predict the near and far future. And turn you into an immortal worm eventually.