• pukeko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m still saucy (in magnitude, bechamel not mole) that the version numbering is yy.n (24.2) and not yy.nn (24.02). The actual versioning combines the “was there a version .1?” problem with a sorting issue if there’s both 24.2 and 24.10.

      • pukeko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If that’s the case, I’m less saucy, but my understanding was that the numbers were based on the release month. (Noting for emphasis that I cannot overstate the absolutely minimal nature of my irritation and that it doesn’t detract even a whisker from my appreciation of Libreoffice! It’s almost, but not quite, tongue in cheek.)

          • pukeko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            It appears that it is. The first version, February-based, is 24.2. The next scheduled version is 24.8, scheduled for release in August.

            • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yeah you are right. For some reason I thought I had seen 24.1 but i was mistaken. Stupid naming scheme this since 24.2 and 24.8 sound like v2 and v8 of the 24.x release. Should have just used 24.mm just like the rest of the foss world does and as you suggested it should be

              • pukeko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Upvoting not because you agreed with me but because of the relief of discovering my flagrantly innocuous frustration might have a kernel of justification.