A long form response to the concerns and comments and general principles many people had in the post about authors suing companies creating LLMs.

  • Guilvareux@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re “complaining” about unique qualities of their art being used, without consent, to create new things which ultimately de-value their original art.

    It’s a debate to be had, I’m not clearly in favour of either argument here, but it’s quite obvious what they’re upset with.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      If it’s a debate to be had then it’s something that should have been debated hundreds of years ago when copyright was first invented, because every author or artist re-uses the “unique qualities” of other peoples’ art when making their own new stuff.

      There’s the famous “good authors copy, great authors steal” quote, but I rather like the related one by C. E. M. Joad mentioned in that article: “the height of originality is skill in concealing origins.”