• toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The free software banshees will call it all proprietary… It’s not that it doesn’t make sense to draw different lines, but when folks treat OSI with a lot of reverence & if they say it doesn’t match their definition, folks want want to use it or release under these titles. “Source available” is also roped in with the we-get-a-monopoly licenses & gets knocked down a peg as if “open source” is the pinnacle of freedom despite the Commons being ransacked by corporations not giving back monetary support or contributions for the labor.

    • chebra@mstdn.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      “source available” licenses are making the commons MORE ransacked by corporations. Which direction do you want to go?

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        This isn’t binary. If you shriek that all things that aren’t open source are the same, then you will miss all the nuance. There is a difference between what Redis just did & copyfair or copyfarleft or Creactive Common Non-Comercial are suggesting.

        • chebra@mstdn.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          @toastal I don’t need to compare each license to each other and get lost in wicked little words, arguing with anonymous accounts on the internet. I can instead see which change was a move towards, or away from, a world ransacked by corporations. That is clearly binary. Would you argue that Redis made the world less ransacked by their license change?