These companies paid their employees a median wage of $31,672 in 2022, while their CEOs took home an average $15.3m

  • solstice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    37% federal plus 5-10% state, plus additional Medicare tax and 3.8% investment income tax and a bunch of others, not good enough for you? That’s literally approaching 50% what’s your problem?

    • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fail to see the problem with your statement.

      50% when you are Uber rich isn’t even that much. In plenty of countries you have that at a much lower level of income. Perfectly doable and fine

        • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not both?

          The problem is that once you are super rich you don’t really have an income anymore. You just expand your wealth and you end up paying way less taxes on that.

          This is something that the common mortal can’t even think of.

          • solstice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            don’t really have an income anymore

            You’re delusional. High and UHNW individuals also tend to have high income.

            just expand your wealth

            Income expands wealth. Unrealized income will be taxed eventually.

            common mortal

            Thank god you’re here to tell us these things. Did you get your accounting degree from university of american samoa too? Please just stop

    • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      37% federal means you are in the tax bracket that makes over $578,000/year. You’ll be just fine with several more percentage points added on.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s literally exactly what I’m advocating for word for word. Wealth tax bad, income tax good. Income tax rate too low? Crank it up to your hearts content. Glad we agree.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So then add more percentage points. You don’t need a wealth tax to do that. Income tax is fine.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A majority of wealth doesn’t come from income so would never be touched by income tax. A “wealth tax” is just a broad term meaning that they should be taxed on the wealth fairly. Like capital gains for instance is a doozy. Way less taxation than what you likely pay (percentage wise obviously).

          So “wealth tax” would include an income tax, capital tax, estate tax etc, all just at rates that are equivalent to how well the system treats them. They get a much larger advantage off the system that is set up than most others.

          And the ultra wealthy don’t even always have an income. You think Bezos has a salary right now that’s significantly attributing to his wealth? Or Buffet or even Zuckerberg? I forget, his his salary still $1 a year? You want to tax only that?

          • solstice@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t get it. Unrealized capital gains are just deferred income. It’ll be taxed eventually. Income tax is fine, banish the thought of wealth tax.

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              But they’re literally not counted under income tax law. So you’re essentially arguing for the exact same thing if you want it to count under some sort of tax.

              Edit: short term capital gains is the only one that counts as income. Long term is not and is severely under taxed compared to income tax. Like, I like your intentions, but you’re severely fucking up the details and it details your entire motivation and intentions.

                • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  When your comment backed me up, I didn’t find any reason to respond. Capital gains tax isn’t income tax. You admitted it by typing it out. You’re just showing that “wealth tax” is just a tax on various means of wealth. I don’t know if English isn’t your first language, but you’re literally agreeing with everyone but saying you don’t.

                  No one owes you anything, nor do they owe you a response. Especially when it didn’t back up your own point.

                  Thanks for typing out a lot of words to say “you want taxes other than income.”

                  You never even offered a rebuttal to what I said. You’re a fucking joke.

                  Don’t talk to me again. You’re so unhinged you came back 6 days because someone decided you weren’t worth the fucking time to respond to due to your shitty ass logic and poor understanding of language. So again, capital gains tax is not income tax. You agree. Thanks. You understand that “wealth tax” is just a broad term that means taxes on things other than their income (which in many cases is $1, such as Zuckerberg).

                  You’re not a CPA. If you are? I feel bad for your clients as they’re gonna get fucked in audits.

    • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The upper-class does not rely on income the same way the middle and lower class do. Taxing income affects us much more than it does them, that’s why you institute a wealth tax to spread the burden.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You simply don’t understand. All income flows into wealth. All wealth is eventually becomes, one way or another, taxable income. You can defer it for a while but it’s literally all the same thing.

        You’re talking about legislating a massive clusterfuck, like you can’t even imagine how messy it would be, that pretty much nobody would comply with free of errors and omissions, all over a timing difference.

        Just please, I’m fucking begging you, stop talking about a wealth tax, especially when you don’t understand how tax works to begin with.