I’m not challenging the rule or anything, it just seems a little out of place here. Potential legal repercussions for our server’s owner maybe?

  • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
    4·
    1 year ago

    That’s a terrible argument for not allowing sourcing, it’s defending no rational reasoning for it whatsoever…

    • Bondrewd@lemmy.world
      21·
      1 year ago

      I can test say LSD analogs with a pretty well distributed array of reagent kits. Same might go for a number of synthetic substances that you usually order on nootropic or research chem sites.

      On the other hand, you cant simply do the same for a plant choke full of different alkaloids.

      If this, and the fact that you can vote manipulate, is not an issue, feel free to nessage anyone for private suggestions on kratom vendors since you are getting roughly the same reliability.

      Also, just fucking do a kratom sub on a federated instance. I would gladly watch how long it lasts.

      • PutangInaMo@lemmy.world
        3·
        1 year ago

        Is it just me or is half the stuff your typing gibberish? Like, for real, the first 2 paragraphs you wrote have nothing to do with anything we are talking about?

        LSD? Reagent kits? Synthetic substance abuse? Noorotropic? None of those has anything to do with kratom or vendors…

        Vote manipulation is an issue with sourcing how exactly? You think somebody is going to use bots to upvote a source in posts or comments? If the kratom sucks somebody will chime in…

        I have no idea what 75% of what you are typing has to do with sourcing either way.

        And why would I make another kratom sub when this already exists albeit with a bad rule against sourcing?