The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
I did not post this article, I merely corrected someone who claimed Hunter’s laptop only contained dick and drug picks. Apparently that was relevant enough for you to get worked up and ask for sources. Then after they were given dispute the authenticity of the sources.
You’re interpreting your lack of understanding for superiority and it’s hilarious to me.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project <- You are Here
1st you asked for sources supporting my original reply. I provided the article which had the emails from Hunters laptop.
Then you claimed the emails were not real, I provided the transcript of Hunter stating they were real.
Then you claimed I was impuning Joe. I provided my original comment which showed I was not.
Now you’re claiming the emails are not important to you but you keep replying.
Where are you going to slither to next?
Gaslight <- You are Here
Obstruct
Project
This just keeps getting funnier and funnier.
So what are you claiming I’m making up?
I didn’t say you were making up anything, you just won’t directly address why Hunter Biden is even relevant here.
Literally your last response.
Do know what gaslight means?
I did not post this article, I merely corrected someone who claimed Hunter’s laptop only contained dick and drug picks. Apparently that was relevant enough for you to get worked up and ask for sources. Then after they were given dispute the authenticity of the sources.
I didn’t accuse you of posting the article, you didn’t have to tell me that, Lemmy says who the poster is lol.
I’m sorry you’re still having trouble understanding.
Then why are you asking me why Hunter Biden is relevant?
The bigger question is why are you so invested in this discussion about Hunter if he’s not relevant.
Simply trying to understand your thought process. If he’s not relevant why even care enough to comment at all?