The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
I asked first, for a source, the one you provided was shit and I already explained why.
Unless you have another, I must conclude your original statement was made without proper citation, and was therefore invalid and not even worth going further.
Because you have failed to properly establish a baseline for any point, I have no questions from you to answer.
You’re really bad about having good faith conversations online. You have to start with a source of acceptable truth. You have failed to do so and continue to double-down on putting the onus on me to argue a point you haven’t yet fully proven.
I asked first, for a source, the one you provided was shit and I already explained why.
Unless you have another, I must conclude your original statement was made without proper citation, and was therefore invalid and not even worth going further.
I did provide another source, Hunter himself who, under oath, confirmed those emails are real. You really need to take a little time to read people’s replies and understand them. It’s ok if you need to reread everything some people need extra time to understand everything.
None of what you provided, even Hunter’s transcripts, implicates Joe in anything. You have yet to directly address this, meaning there’s nothing for me to respond to.
Once again, Hunter is not relevant to anything political or conservative in any way, so there’s no point in saying anymore on him.
Maybe if I ask again slowly, you’ll get it:
Where is Joe shown to be actively a part of criminal activity via authentic data from Hunter’s laptop?
None of what you provided, even Hunter’s transcripts, implicates Joe in anything. You have yet to directly address this, meaning there’s nothing for me to respond to.
Your back to this lie, I never claimed Joe was implicated by the emails. In my very first response I said there was no evidence that he was involved. I have no idea what mental defect you posses that causes you to be unable to understand this.
Once again, Hunter is not relevant to anything political or conservative in any way, so there’s no point in saying anymore on him.
If that’s true then why do you keep responding? Why were you so triggered by me saying hunters emails had more than drug and dick picks?
I guess you are unable to answer my questions.
Says the guy the continues to refuse to answer mine even though I asked first.
Gaslight
Obstruct <- You are Here
Project
I’ve answered your questions, it’s quite telling that you refuse to answer mine.
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project <- You are Here
Still afraid to answer my question I see.
Once again, I’ll answer you when you answer me.
I asked first, for a source, the one you provided was shit and I already explained why.
Unless you have another, I must conclude your original statement was made without proper citation, and was therefore invalid and not even worth going further.
Because you have failed to properly establish a baseline for any point, I have no questions from you to answer.
You’re really bad about having good faith conversations online. You have to start with a source of acceptable truth. You have failed to do so and continue to double-down on putting the onus on me to argue a point you haven’t yet fully proven.
Gaslight <- You are Here
Obstruct
Project
I did provide another source, Hunter himself who, under oath, confirmed those emails are real. You really need to take a little time to read people’s replies and understand them. It’s ok if you need to reread everything some people need extra time to understand everything.
HAHAHAHA you still don’t get it.
None of what you provided, even Hunter’s transcripts, implicates Joe in anything. You have yet to directly address this, meaning there’s nothing for me to respond to.
Once again, Hunter is not relevant to anything political or conservative in any way, so there’s no point in saying anymore on him.
Maybe if I ask again slowly, you’ll get it:
Where is Joe shown to be actively a part of criminal activity via authentic data from Hunter’s laptop?
Gaslight
Obstruct <- You are Here
Project
Your back to this lie, I never claimed Joe was implicated by the emails. In my very first response I said there was no evidence that he was involved. I have no idea what mental defect you posses that causes you to be unable to understand this.
If that’s true then why do you keep responding? Why were you so triggered by me saying hunters emails had more than drug and dick picks?