The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

    • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 days ago

      So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

      No thanks.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing

        After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

        but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

        Let’s make copyright non-transferable. For a company to retain copyright it must employ the creator.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

          In October 2012, Disney acquired Lucasfilm for $4.05 billion.

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        You don’t pay a plumber every single time you use his work 15 yrs after his death.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        To retain copyright:-

        $2^n for year n

        $1 for year 1

        $2 for year 2

        $4 for year 3

        $1k for year 10

        $32k for year 15

        $1m for year 20

        $1bn for year 30

    • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Like, maybe tiered to something like 5 years: pay what it costs now, 10 years: 10 times that cost, and 15 years: 100 times, with a hard cap at 15? I could get behind that.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yeah. Something like that. Maybe don’t even need a cap.

        If you pay $2^n each year n to retain copyright then by year 30 you are into the billions.

      • kryptonite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        5 years: pay what it costs now

        It doesn’t cost anything to copyright something. You just automatically own the copyright to something you create.

        (This may vary outside the US; I’m not familiar with international copyright law.)