• stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yes. It is. It’s assumed because that’s how the legal theories at the time it was written went.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s clear that you think that it was written in a vacuum without any historical context. That’s not how history works. It’s unclear why you are stuck on this particular hill.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Oh ive learned plenty. That the constitution has nothing in it to support common law.