• simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Woah, this is huge. Claude 1 was already more useful and coherent than ChatGPT (3.5, not 4). The big point was that it wasn’t available to everyone. This could really steal some marketshare from OpenAI if things go well.

    • Wooly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      What market though? These AI chatbots seem like money sinks for a potential development into something useful in the distant future.

      • simple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The market of people buying APIs for popular chatbots. Right now OpenAI’s GPT is overwhelmingly the most popular option and pretty expensive. You constantly see a lot of “powered by GPT” features on products now, but hopefully Claude can provide some better competition.

        • Wooly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair, I don’t see any real use for these right now. Chatbots just seem like a gimmick that can help people cheat in school (not that I give a fuck about that). Probably just the online circles we run in, what sorta things are powered by GPT? Customer support and stuff?

          • simple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’ve got stuff like helping assistants on Duolingo and Khan Academy powered by GPT-4, you’ve got stuff like tools for automatic search engine optimization, tools for automatic code generation, tools for grammar spell checking, tools for translation, and probably a lot more I’m unaware of.

            There’s quite a lot of people depending on GPT right now.