• zazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    In my country here’s how it works:

    1. Parties provides free food and transport to unemployed masses they know will vote for them
    2. Wait 3-4 hours in queue at polling station to receive ballot in person
    3. Drop ballot in secure box
    4. Go back to work for a few days
    5. See on election day that the party that spent the most on voter courting wins

    How would you propose we deal with this when people who are working (and can’t take a day off to go vote) would come out in much smaller numbers than ones that have nothing else to do (and get free lunch and transit to and from the polling stations) and even when voting happens on a weekend you have to trade your only time off to go and vote out of the goodness of your heart.

    I think this is one of the reasons for digital voting - I’d much rather be able to vote from work or home or anywhere when I don’t have the time to sit on a queue for 5 hours just to have my vote diminished by a group that isn’t politically active but loves a free lunch and something to do

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      EVMs aren’t a vote from home option, they just replace steps 1&2 with a machine instead of a ballot drop box. So maybe your wait goes down to 2-3 hours because it’s a little faster.

      I’m saying we replace the physical voting locations entirely and you can drop your ballot in your mailbox, or drop it at one of the secure voting boxes throughout the city. So it doesn’t matter if you work two jobs and can’t get a couple hours off, if you can check your mail and fill out a form, you can vote. And the ballot comes a few weeks before election day, so you have time.

      I think we should also have a federal “election day” holiday so people can research candidates and vote.

    • TVgog56789@lemy.lolOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I am not in favour of EVMs here.

      However there are pros and cons for both systems

      I am just saying if you go for an electronic voting system using an airtight blockchain like Bitcoin and ethereum to verify votes using a biometric database is the only system trustworthy enough because.

      If you use multiple blockchains like these it would require 10 trillion dollars or more to get the computing and staking power to hack the system.

      It’s inconceivably costlier than hacking a physical election.

      Russia also has paper ballots and I can assure you we can easily kick out Putin with a blockchain based voting system.