• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They’re trying to raise 1.8 mil to keep a single blockbuster open. Physical media isn’t profitable anymore. Though I guess they’re trying to preserve that rather than the movies themselves.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Have you been to scarecrow? Every time I go, I get a vivid sense of the scope of cinema as an art form. It’s humbling and tantalising, like I’m crawling through a dragons hoard looking for just the right treasure.

        You wouldn’t call it “a blockbuster” if you’d been there.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I appreciate that it’s not literally like a blockbuster, but they’re running a giant physical media rental archive. The only ones that can really participate are locals, and it’s up to the locals to prop them up. Now if they solicited donations to digitize and make available their collection for archival purposes? That’d turn heads.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I’m not against digitisation and preservation, but their collection is by no means solely in the realm of public domain works. They keep current, and cast a wide net. Getting digital streaming rights to everything they’ve got would be a legal-logistical nightmare even for a startup with billions in venture capital.