• areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It sounded like you are comparing the stonehenge protest to the one with the planes, not with climate change. Safety is critical in aviation, so it might sound dangerous to people that the planes were painted. I would instead say something like “they are valuing literal rocks over the lives of people claimed by climate disasters”. Then it’s clear you are talking about climate change in the second instance, and not the people flying the plane.

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        No. You still don’t get it. People think you are comparing stone henge (just rocks) to human lives (potential air disaster from painting a plane and damaging something). Rather than the human lives being lost from climate change.

        I legitimately can’t tell if you are legitimately struggling to understand or you are one of the bad faith actors you talk about.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          How?! Neither I nor the comment I replied to mentioned planes the only way you could make that jump is if you didn’t bother to read the chain and instead jump to conclusions based on limited context and the title of the article.