• HurkieDrubman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    American cars having their brake lights and turn signals be the same light is stupid and dangerous.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 days ago

    When changing lanes or turning you are supposed to use the turning signal before doing the manouver. The turning signal is supposed to warn other drivers that you are going to do something. It doesn’t make any sense to use the turning signal when already mid-turning or while already changing lanes. Many drivers don’t seem to know that.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Things you will need to operate while driving your car shouldn’t have touch screen controls.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    That we’d all be better off if we accepted our own fallibility. That we are not perfect little robots, and as a result more tolerance and forgiveness in the world is necessary.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here’s one that’s not as consequential as other posts here. It’s not going to change the world, but would make things slightly better.

    Split lock washers are worse than useless. They’re supposed to be a spring against the bolt to help resist it turning back out over time. They don’t. If anything, they make it worse.

    Here’s a NASA publication on fastener design (because of course there’s a NASA publication on fastener design): https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19900009424

    The lockwasher serves as a spring while the bolt is being tightened. However, the washer is normally flat by the time the bolt is fully torqued. At this time it is equivalent to a solid flat washer, and its locking ability is nonexistent. In summary, a Iockwasher of this type is useless for locking.

    This was published in 1990, but we’re still using this shit. Stop. There are many other kinds of fastener locking that work, like nylon locking nuts or threadlock, and we don’t need these.

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    That documentation is supposed to explain how a thing works to people who don’t know how it works. I know, sounds extremely obvious, but you’d be surprised how much documentation out there is written in a way, expecting you to already know what it’s talking about. No. I do not. It is the documentation’s job to explain ME what IT is talking about…

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 days ago

    That other than a niche we specialize in, we’re pretty fucking dumb at everything else.

  • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    “Homeopathic” does not mean organic, or good for you, natural, wholesome, effective, or inherently safe to consume.

    It is, in fact, a code word for no active ingredient.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    6 days ago

    How corporations use advertisements to influence how the media reports on their activities. Prime example is how BP ran all those “We’re Sorry” ads when they poisoned the Gulf of Mexico. They weren’t apologizing to the public. They were using the ads to pass bribes to the news agencies to make sure to give them soft coverage when they should have been ranking them over the coals.

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      7 days ago

      For people who don’t know, the theory of chiropractics is that the light of God somehow shines into the human body through the top of the head, travels down the spine, and on through the nerves. If you can just fix any blockages (aka “subluxations”) in that flow then it will be impossible for disease to exist in the body. Because God’s light.

      The founder of chiropractics was told this information by a ghost.

      I know some people swear by chiropractic adjustments, but this is information I wish I’d known when I had my back injury because going to a chiropractor set my recovery back by at least three years. And the money I lost to that quack could have paid for not only the legit physical therapist that actually got me feeling better, but probably a decent massage chair too.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’ve never heard a chiropractor say that. How do I know what you just claimed about that field isn’t misinformation?

        • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          From the Wikipedia article:

          “Early chiropractors believed that all disease was caused by interruptions in the flow of innate intelligence, a vitalistic nervous energy or life force that represented God’s presence in man; chiropractic leaders often invoked religious imagery and moral traditions. D. D. Palmer said he ‘received chiropractic from the other world’. D. D. and B. J. [Palmer] both seriously considered declaring chiropractic a religion, which might have provided legal protection under the U.S. constitution, but decided against it partly to avoid confusion with Christian Science.”*

          Why would a chiropractor tell you that? Nobody selling you a quack remedy is going to just come out and tell you it’s quack remedy. That’s rule #1 of selling quack remedies. But the history of chiropractics isn’t a secret, Neither are the statistics on vertebral artery dissection and other injuries caused by chiropractic adjustments. But look, I’m not your mommy. You don’t have to believe me, and you’re free to go do what you feel. It’s your own neck you’re risking.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Wow, I knew chiropractors were quacks, but I didn’t know it was this bad. Thanks for sharing this; I’m sorry that you didn’t have this information when you most needed it.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think you’ve just reconciled two things:

        1. Internet always says chiropractors are quacks

        2. Multiple reasonable people IRL have praised their own chiropractors

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Someone can praise their chiropractor, in the end that’s anecdotal and then I could point to all the people that have become paralyzed due to chiros.

          All of them are quacks because most of what they do to people is bullshit and potentially harmful, it just happens that they sometimes also do some things that are actually ok but it’s methods employed by an actual medical field.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        My chiro has all his training in physiotherapy. So is he a quack or is he a pro? I’m so confused!

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      Are you sure? I’m pretty sure the ghost that taught DD Palmer the art of chiropracticness was totally legit. DD even said the ghost was a doctor, why would you not believe him?!?

    • Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Depends on what you mean by that. PTs can use chiropractic techniques to great effect.

      But there is a MASSIVE difference between an actual PT that sometimes uses specific chiropractic techniques and the con artists who try to shake your down for weekly neck cracks.

  • Copythis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    The spices at the grocery store I’ve been going to for the past 25 years has had the spices alphabetized this entire time.

    Edit, I misread the question but I’m not fixing my response

  • fireweed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Perpetual growth in a finite system is impossible, and anything that relies on perpetual growth to function is doomed to eventually fail.

    For instance: social services that rely on perpetual population growth (especially youth population; e.g. Japan/South Korea), companies that rely on perpetual increase in users (most publicly-owned companies; e g. basically every social media company ATM), industries that rely on perpetual advancements in technology (e.g. industrialized agriculture, which constantly needs new ways to fight self-induced problems like soil depletion and erosion), housing as wealth generation (to be a wealth generator it has to outpace inflation, but at a certain point no one will be able to afford to purchase houses at their inflated prices no matter how over-leveraged they get; e.g. Canada). [Note that these are merely examples where these issues are currently coming to a head; they are by no means special cases, they’re just in a more advanced state of “finding out.”]

    In other words, a lot of the modern world, in both public and private sectors, is built around a series of ponzi schemes.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    You cannot achieve any good by hurting people.

    People are so convinced that if we’re more cruel to criminals, they’ll stop committing crimes, or if we’re harsher to workers, we’ll work harder, or if you’re tough on border controls, immigrants will go away. It does not work and it cannot work.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      To quote a theorem from one of my engineering courses:

      An optimized system can consist only of optimized subsystems.

      This means any time you’re preparing to make something small worse, for the global good, it’s a mathematical fact you’re about to do the wrong thing.

      • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        killing nazis makes the ones you weren’t able to kill more steadfast in their beliefs, (so it becomes harder to make them stop being nazis without killing them) and it makes it easier for them to convert others into becoming nazis (such as using it as ‘proof’ that they are oppressed)

      • jh29a@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Well, (my vegetarian friend’s least favourite dumb philosophical question:) Is Death Even Actually Painful?

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’d argue that cops existing also counts as “doing harm” to the people who would be cops. I remember a while back when I learned about how cops are trained (stuff that causes them to see everyone as a potential criminal who wants to kill them), I felt profoundly sad because as well as the harm that the cops cause as a result of this, it also just seems like a terrible way to live. I honestly feel sorry for cops