• halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    It seems that way. I only addressed the article, and some of them were talking as if I was advocating death penalties for people expressing themselves.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      That or you’re ignoring that they absolutely are establishing a death sentence for it. Will they apply it to everyone?

      No, probably not. But who could stop them if they did decide that all Taiwanese advocates are extreme cases? Keeping in mind that their definition of extreme seems to be “leader.”

      Personally I find your casual acceptance of the right of the state to execute anyone short of a brownshirt contemptible enough by itself, but go on about how they’re only going to put the non-leadership people in prison for 3 years.

      • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        My comments aren’t advocating, ignoring, or accepting the death penalty. I can’t speculate to China’s intent behind the law, or assume it’s application.

        I was addressing the sensationalist nature of the article, about how it latched onto the passage about death for the purpose of generating clicks.

        To discuss the why or the how behind the law is another matter entirely and goes well beyond the scope of my comment. I’m sure there are plenty of discussions out there that cover those topics, however.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      It is funny to see how wild people get when someone points out an article about China is bad or a headline is deceptive, if the article was about Ukraine or somewhere doing the same thing then then the only comment you’d see is ‘bad headline!’ followed by endless nuance.

      A lot of people don’t like their binary thinking and simplistic worldview tainted.

      • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Absolutely. I agree that life would be so much simpler if it was only black and white issues, but rarely is that the case. And I get it, those binary beliefs are comfortable. But we need to endure the difficulty of questioning our assumptions, pushing out of that simplistic worldview, and learning. It’s the only way we grow as people.