RustRover Is Released and Includes a Free Non-Commercial Option | The RustRover Blog
blog.jetbrains.com
We’re excited to announce the general availability of RustRover, the powerhouse IDE for Rust developers!

Rust Rover is out of preview and is free for non-commercial use. The only caveat is:

It’s also important to note that if you’re using a non-commercial license, you cannot opt out of the collection of anonymous usage statistics.

  • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
    41·
    4 months ago

    Ugh yeah that’s infuriating on Github search too. Obviously if I’m searching for some identifier I don’t want 10 pages of results in /tests.

    How hard can it be? Just weight anything with test in the file path lower than everything else. Job done.

    • BB_C@programming.dev
      13·
      4 months ago

      You two bring shame to the programming community.
      Just ripgrep cargo expanded output for f**** sake.

          • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
            1·
            4 months ago

            I know what both of those are and how to use them. But they are entirely relevant to the thread. Did you comment in the wrong place?

            • BB_C@programming.dev
              21·
              4 months ago

              Not sure how what I write is this confusing to you.

              • Tests don’t necessarily live in paths containing test.
              • Code in paths containing test is not necessarily all tests.
              • cargo expand gives you options for correctly and coherently expanding Rust code, and doesn’t expand tests by default.
              • rg was half a joke since it’s Rust’s grep. You can just pipe cargo expand [OPTIONS] [ITEM] output to vim '+set ft=rust' - or bat --filename t.rs and search from there.
              • krangled@programming.dev
                1·
                4 months ago

                You’re not smart. You’re not special. Nobody is giving you a medal because you know a workaround to a developer not implementing a feature request after five years, especially when said feature IS ALREADY IMPLEMENTED in a different language in the same IDE.

                So again, what does your response have to do with how an IDE works? Nothing. It has nothing to do with it, you’re posting purely to jerk yourself off.

                • BB_C@programming.dev
                  11·
                  4 months ago

                  My post was a showcase of why there is no substitute for knowing your tools properly, and how when you know them properly, you will never have to wait for 5 minutes, let alone 5 years, for anything, because you never used or needed to use an IDE anyway.

                  This applies universally. No minimum smartness or specialness scores required.

                  • krangled@programming.dev
                    1·
                    4 months ago

                    This type of reductive horseshit has no place anywhere.

                    “I have a criticism of this piece of software because it does not have this functionality.”

                    “WELL JUST USE A DIFFERENT TOOL!”

                    Yeah, no shit. This isn’t about using a different tool now is it?

                    You reek of basement-ass teenager that’s never actually had to use shit for a living. If you’re somehow actually a grown adult I pity your coworkers, who are all likely sick of your garbage-tier attitude.