• dezmd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    A hurricane has a serious impact on the people and infrastructure of a state. A governor unwilling to put an emergency among the people he was elected to represent ahead of a foreign investment trip deserves every drop of the outrage that he brings upon himself.

    This is an example of when outrage is real and deserved rather than manufactured. Your hand waving is out of place.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Whether he deserves “every drop of outrage” is subjective, so hard to argue with you on that.

      However, you’re arguing here a case of priorities, one I agree with.

      But the top level poster is claiming that he’s going on vacation instead. Which is not reasonable. It’s basically lying. Which is my point: it’s not about being reasonable (in your case pointing out misplaced priorities), it’s about being as outraged as possible (spinning it into a vacation).

      You seem like a reasonable person, so don’t defend this garbage.

      • dezmd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I do try to remain reasonable.

        I was commenting on the garbage decision of the governor to leave the state, rather than the garbage decision of OP to make up or repeat misinformation that it was outrage over a Cruz vacation. I’m with you on avoiding manufactured outrage.

        “It’s not a vacation. He’s there on a planned political trip.” can be seen defense of the governor when you omit the details.

        You didn’t just call out OP’s bad information garbage, you implied, whether intentionally or not, that there was no issue of what the governor was doing.

        That is what compelled my reply.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You didn’t just call out OP’s bad information garbage, you implied, whether intentionally or not, that there was no issue of what the governor was doing.

          In my own defense, I did not imply it, you inferred it probably because you interpreted any defense of him, despite being couched in trepidation of defending him at all, as a defense of the trip.

          I can see why explicitly not saying it I left this open to interpretation, so I don’t consider myself blameless, but I certainly did not imply it.