Honestly, I will never wrap my head around how people can happily bring infants on any flight where you can expect people to try and sleep, it’s incredibly lucky if they don’t spend some of it screaming their heads off—I would be mortified if my choices were preventing hundreds of people from sleeping. But I’m not going to rant too hard about that.

Why on earth hasn’t any airline started marketing adult-only flights?

It seems like a complete no brainer to me, I would choose it every time and pay extra for it.

Disclaimer: I may or may not be on a 36h day with only an hour of sleep right now

  • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m an adult with adult responsibilities and obligations. Occasionally I do have to be on a plane. That child’s presence is almost certainly not required somewhere with such urgency that they simply must be on a plane. Also I can and do behave myself so I don’t need to be justified. Babies usually can’t and don’t, which is why we’re having this conversation in the first place

    • Nach [Ohio]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      We need a travel justification board so only truly necessary air travel is authorized and approved. Nein. No babiez on ze plane

      Consider it the price you pay for travel freedom.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      We can leave the child’s travel urgency and behaviour out of this, I think. Kids don’t decide to travel on a plane, and they behave how they do. This is really about the parents. They are the ones taking their children on planes. So, they are adults with responsibilities and obligations which includes caring for their children and usually that means bringing them with them on planes.