• democracy1984@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Abortion isn’t a simple human rights issue. Every human has a right to choose what happens to their body, and every human has a right to live.

    But with pregnancy, these rights are at odds with each other. Who’s right is more important, the right of the baby to be born, or the right of the mother to not give birth? And at exactly what moment does this change?

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Her body, her choice. The fetus is a parasitic clump of cells until it comes- out of the womb, and it is entirely up to her what she wants to do with it. The fetus does not have the right to be born as it is a clump of parasitic cells, not a person. Bodily autonomy is a fundamental right, the government cannot force you to donate blood, even if it would kill someone else who needs it if you didn’t. So why should a woman have to carry around an unwanted parasite that does permanent, often harmful changes to her body and can sometimes kill her?