A California-based startup called Savor has figured out a unique way to make a butter alternative that doesn’t involve livestock, plants, or even displacing land. Their butter is produced from synthetic fat made using carbon dioxide and hydrogen, and the best part is —- it tastes just like regular butter.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Tilling, seeding, treating, and harvesting all require machinery and therefore increase carbon output in farming.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah. But since farm animals are often fed from farmed plants these days, animal-based tends to be worse by quite a solid factor. This article puts butter at 4x worse than margarine, for example: https://www.forkranger.com/blog/is-margarine-a-sustainable-alternative-for-butter/

      How plant-based compares to this new process still needs to be seen for sure. If it’s just a machine you can plug in at the store and everyone can get their butter like out of an ice cream machine, without transport and cooling chain, then it’s likely a lot better.
      But at this point, I don’t expect the process to be much more efficient than what plants are doing, which means you’d still need a ton of energy and particularly also land area for it.

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Your comment existing has a carbon footprint, doesn’t mean it should be paired with the dairy industry’s

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Plus the simple effects of land conversion. Plus the emissions from the feces.