mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 4 months agoPoll shows 84% of PC users unwilling to pay extra for AI-enhanced hardwarevideocardz.comexternal-linkmessage-square128fedilinkarrow-up1403arrow-down12cross-posted to: pcmasterrace@zerobytes.monsteramd@zerobytes.monstertechnology@zerobytes.monster
arrow-up1401arrow-down1external-linkPoll shows 84% of PC users unwilling to pay extra for AI-enhanced hardwarevideocardz.commr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 4 months agomessage-square128fedilinkcross-posted to: pcmasterrace@zerobytes.monsteramd@zerobytes.monstertechnology@zerobytes.monster
minus-squarecapital@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·4 months agoMy old ass GTX 1060 runs some of the open source language models. I imagine the more recent cards would handle them easily. What’s the “AI” hardware supposed to do that any gamer with recent hardware can’t?
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoRun it faster. A CPU can also compute graphics but you wait significant more time than using hardware accelerated graphics hardware.
My old ass GTX 1060 runs some of the open source language models. I imagine the more recent cards would handle them easily.
What’s the “AI” hardware supposed to do that any gamer with recent hardware can’t?
Run it faster.
A CPU can also compute graphics but you wait significant more time than using hardware accelerated graphics hardware.