nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 months agoIntel can't stay silent for much longerwww.digitaltrends.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up139arrow-down1external-linkIntel can't stay silent for much longerwww.digitaltrends.comnanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBarbecueCowboy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·4 months agoI would think the fact that they’re silent indicates that they don’t have a fix that they like. If that’s the case, I’d imagine they’d keep silent until that changes or they get sued.
minus-squarenarc0tic_bird@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·4 months agoI feel like once a chip shows the symptoms, it has already degraded that much that a software fix won’t help, it won’t run stable even at conservative power/voltage limits at this point.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 months agoThe6ve already tried the iPhone approach and just tried to lower the performance of the chips for everyone.
I would think the fact that they’re silent indicates that they don’t have a fix that they like.
If that’s the case, I’d imagine they’d keep silent until that changes or they get sued.
I feel like once a chip shows the symptoms, it has already degraded that much that a software fix won’t help, it won’t run stable even at conservative power/voltage limits at this point.
The6ve already tried the iPhone approach and just tried to lower the performance of the chips for everyone.