• HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    No harm meant. I do think Steam is the golden example of a big business done right. All I’m saying is that there’s room for improvement.

    However do we know their full PNL/balance sheet?

    We can make an educated guess. Amazon’s S3 charges roughly $0.025 per GB, so an 100GB game would cost $2.50 for Steam to upload to a user. For a $30 game, that’s around ~8.5% or just over 3 downloads before it’s unprofitable.

    Obviously Valve isn’t paying consumer level S3 prices, and obviously users can download multiple times. But I would be extremely surprised if they didn’t make a rather large margin on each sale

    • Corigan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Total fair always room for improvement, no ones perfect.

      Appreciate the good discussion!

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Amazon’s S3 charges roughly $0.025 per GB

      For storage or for download?

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Download. It’s also rounded up. Storage is negligible compared to bandwidth, especially considering Steam’s business model