As my latest batch is already quite the experiment, I decided to even go a little further and not use a traditional bubbler to vent off CO2 from my bucket this time, but opt for a keg to do that.

The rubber seal in the hole of the bucket‘s lid takes a 9.5 mm hose snugly, which connects to the gas intake of a keg filled with a good 5 litres of disinfectant. The keg’s liquid out has a line attached to go into the depicted 5 litre can.
This way, at the end of fermentation, I’ll have a sanitised keg & can, and the keg is already full of CO2. Also, should I experience suckback from changing temperatures (mind you, my setup lives in my garage), there is a buffer of CO2 in the keg for that, and the line into the can is the one I use to package from the bucket, so it’s nice that it gets sanitised along the way too.

What do you think? So far, my only concern is how much pressure buildup is required to displace the disinfectant from the keg and if the bucket’s lid with the attached hosing is tight enough for that.

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    That probably shouldn’t happen, cause it would pull a vacuum on your beer (wonder what effect that would have). It might be able to pull a siphon for a short time, and then cut off. You would then have like an oscillation of pressure on your beer which probably isn’t ideal. Definitely a good move to put the can higher.

    I wonder if there’s a good way to prevent any siphoning from going the other way.

    • Aarkon@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Uh, I haven’t even thought about the possibility of reverse siphoning. Maybe better I’d better leave the can where it is? To my understanding, siphoning “uphill” is way harder (if even possible at all, given a specific liquid, height, tube diameter etc). The possible pressure oscillation sounds less “threatening” to me right now.