• Lumisal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s also a really really old type of rpg similar to DnD that can be played with a rare kind of tarot deck called a Minchiate (97 card deck)

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Sorry, no link - read it from a library book about card game history.

              From my recollection:

              I do remember it was called “Oracolo” and was played in Italy, normally by family members for the younger kids. It’s part of other “story games” people would play using the bigger tarot card decks especially (something played since Mamluk deck days). You’d basically start a story about how the person is a traveler, and make up the story on the fly based off what you drew from the deck, and the kid would respond as well and then a dice would be rolled to see if they’re successful.

              With Oracolo, the goal was to make it to old age and die peacefully as you go through life. You’d do this by going through the entire deck, with pips being bonuses or negatives that would be used (like, if you had chosen to be a carpenter, and got a 3, then that might be how much furniture you sold and how successful you currently are).

              Every card you passed through would get set aside, with the exception of Death, which would always get shuffled back in if you survived. Death would always be the final card.

              There’s other story games too people would play too. This is where the idea of using Tarot decks for divination came from actually during the Victorian era (as these story games were primarily played in Latin descendant speaking countries such as France, Spain, and Italy).

              My own dad would sometimes play a story game his dad taught him using an old Tarocco Siciliano deck we had (the one that uses cups, clubs, coins, and swords). Although his was a Christian version where the goal was both survive and to go to heaven, and used more as a morality type game.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Atheist utilitarian technology professional here. I read tarot. Not because I believe anything mystical is coming through the cards. They just happen to be a very rich and rounded set of symbology to lay out and use to talk through a topic. I have never had anyone walk away from one of my readings without saying “that was more interesting than I thought it was going to be.” Of course my style is very interactive and I involve them a lot as we go. Of course others out there take an oracular approach that’s utter horseshit.

        • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You didn’t understand. You seem to think that belief in magic or future reading or some other stuff is necessary to play tarot, but that’s not true.

          You can use the cards instead as a brainstorming tool that helps you direct your thinking into new avenues that you haven’t considered so far. No bullshit necessary.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            And I go to the Cathedral’s confessional for therapy, my chiropractor for all health ailments, and my life coach and CrossFit trainer tells me joint pain is just weakness leaving the body

            And I’m FINE! Not fucked up at all.

      • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Indeed. Sometimes it’s helpful to filter your thoughts through a different lense, and tarot can spark ideas or aspects you hadn’t considered as you try to fit things within the context of the cards you’re seeing.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        “I play therapist by telling my clients they are the decrepit goblin that stumbled into the stinky swamp and ask them if they want to try to get out of it by using the enchanted axe or call upon the great dragon to lift them up.”

  • 33550336@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    You SHOULD fear alcohol and cigarettes, but from scientific reasons. Tarot is also unaceptable for a scientific mind.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      “Using a framing device to interpret your feelings is unacceptable to a scientific mind”

      Okay square.

    • skye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you don’t try to predict your life with Tarot, it can be a fun story creativity task.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’d say more that if you don’t genuinely think it predicts your life, it can be fun. It’s like reading horoscopes and chuckling at them.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Tarot cards have cool artwork on them, and they are as harmful as a RNG, or cootie catchers.

      • 33550336@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Artwork is perfectly fine, but shaping your view about the reality and directing your life based on tarot is pure superstition and stupidity.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It’s a random number generator. It’s shuffled cards put in random order to tell a story, or focus someone on their own thoughts without distractions of self doubt. To bring order to a chaotic existence. Not all mysticism is superstition. Not all rituals are pointless, many attempt to bring people to a liminal state, an attitude of being in-between, standing at the threshold. We can keep the useful elements of these things and discard the rest. No one needs to base there life around anything they don’t like.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            You speak like a religious person because this is a superstitious ritual, have fun I guess but I think it’s incredibly stupid.

            You might as well try to read your future in PUBG loot boxes. Probably cheaper, too.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s nothing wrong with tarot as a concept. It’s a wonderful self reflection and guided meditation tool. Just don’t ascribe magical precognitive powers to it and you’re fine.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      You SHOULD fear alcohol

      I think fearing it is going a bit overboard. Moderation is the key.

      • 33550336@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Science says there is no healthy dose of alcohol - no moderation, but complete absence.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Healthy for what, exactly? Because it certainly isn’t incompatible with a long, good, moderately healthy life.

          I’m guessing if you want to perform at peak or reduce your risk of cancer as much as humanly possible, then sure. But that’s probably the goal of a minority.

            • Comment105@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yeah, it’s a very technically correct wording of “We cannot talk about a so-called safe level of alcohol use. It doesn’t matter how much you drink – the risk to the drinker’s health starts from the first drop of any alcoholic beverage. The only thing that we can say for sure is that the more you drink, the more harmful it is – or, in other words, the less you drink, the safer it is.”

              There’s nothing wrong with this statement.

              It’s simply that the risks are in practice pretty negligible for the most part.

              The exact same sentence structure also works with “We cannot talk about a so-called safe level of driving. It doesn’t matter how much you drive – the risk to the driver’s health starts from the first kilometer on any public road. The only thing that we can say for sure is that the more you drive, the more dangerous it is – or, in other words, the less you drive, the safer it is.”

              I’m not sure on the statistics, but I’d guess if you compared the risks between drivers and drinkers at different segments of a normal distribution of drinking/driving quantity, driving would be more risky. I haven’t checked, though. There would probably be a better way to compare the risks, I haven’t looked at any of the statistics recently.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Nobody claimed othetwise. Just that fearing it is silly. It won’t have much of an effect at all on your health in moderation.

    • nednobbins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tarok is played with tarot cards and you can still get the OG set from Piatnik.

      Just in case you’re trying to impress some Austrian grandma…

    • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I like tarot because it’s like „death; the tower of doom; the swamp of famine” and that means that you’re gonna have a chill week or something

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        FWIW, tarot decks were used for card playing before they were used for divining money from the gullible

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          divining money from the gullible

          Thank you for phrasing it this way. Superstitious nonsense is all fun and games until someone loses a buck.

          Tarot / psychics / etc. being used for personal and financial gain by preying on the vulnerable is far too common and needs to be called out for what it is. People who peddle this hokum for personal and financial gain are no better than TV preachers.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            so, I’m not entirely sure you quite got it. Before our modern deck of cards, which we play games like shanghai rummy or spades or texas holdem, etc, it was the tarot deck. the scammers that ran around as fortune tellers used the generic standard playing card deck of the time to do it.

            It’d be like me doing some slight of hand with the deck and telling fortunes or something. “an here we have the Ace of Spades, a clear indication of strength and nobilty. You have a challenge ahead of you; but you will face it with dignity. And with with … oh dear… the suicide king, that is a powerful omen of self-sabotage. but I have a charm against ill omens for thirty internet points!”

            • mPony@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              yes, I already know that there is a history to it that has been tainted by modern skullduggery.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        The card that portends doom is the Tower, usually. There are as many interpretations of Tarot as there are folks that read it, but Death usually means “change.”

        Tarot is largely harmless; it’s odd how upset folks on Lemmy get over it. It’s mostly middle aged women and queer men who do it for fun. I use it as a way of organizing my thoughts sometimes - I own a few decks which I enjoy as art pieces and brainstorming tools. I’ll read for friends sometimes and I’m pretty open about the fact that I’m mostly leaning on what the cards do in the Binding of Isaac.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I dislike all means of normalizing magical thinking, that includes things as petty as tarot and horoscopes and making wishes. Decks as art are cool, cosplay mysticism makes superstition more mainstream.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It doesn’t mean you’re gonna have a chill week.

        It means literally nothing.

        “You drew a royal flush, congratulations. That means the local mayor will give you an enema. Since it’s in the suit of clubs, that means it’ll happen on Tuesday afternoon. That’ll be $30, thanks. Go get flushed, retard.”

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      There’s a bunch of card games you can play with tarot decks. People should mention this more so that they become more popular again. The people using them for non game reasons is the same as if they were using a Yu-Gi-Oh deck for it.

      PS: the standard 52 deck is also a kind of tarot deck.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      No, we use it as a reframing device. You basically point a random story generator at currently relevant facets of your life. This helps you to see them from a new perspective, which can get you unstuck when you have reasoned yourself into a corner.

      There’s absolutely no belief in magic necessary to use it.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        People who use tarot absolutely believe in magic.

        I loathe apologists.

        I personally hate people who try to marry atheism and mysticism as a unified community. It is completely at odds with my values.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      *don’t play DnD with a killer DM.

      Unless you’re into that. (I assure you, it’s way more exciting if you let me occasionally kill a character. I promise it won’t happen too often, and it’ll be in the oneshots… which i tune to be challenging.)

      but if you play with a carebear DM… you’ll get fluff campaigns.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Killer DMs are fine, so long as they show up with a stack of character sheets and you know what you’re getting into. There’s a D&D variant called “Kobolds Ate My Baby” where you immediately respawn the turn after you die as a new Kobold and charge right back into the mix.

        if you play with a carebear DM… you’ll get fluff campaigns

        Story heavy campaigns with generous rules for resurrection and a focus on social interaction over combat give you more time to engage in high drama. When you’re not worried about a bad die roll ending a character arc, you don’t feel the urge to minmax in order to have fun and can play up the fluffier aspects of the game.

        Perma-Death also tends to mean more when it happens less often. Having an “In Memoriam” game for a beloved character means a bit more than throwing half a dozen alts into a ditch.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yup!

          So, like during Covid, I might have gone a little stir crazy, and built my own little universe with this massive (and tweaked-as-they-went) collection of story arcs. I used stardrifter’s rules

          I touch one of those characters and I’m a dead dm. But they’ve been playing those characters for years now.

          The way I’ve learned to do it is to build some sort of resurrection system in as the game progresses. The one shot style single-night campaigns with fresh characters, those are where I’m allowed to create new and interesting (and usually hilarious) ways for them to die.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The one shot style single-night campaigns with fresh characters, those are where I’m allowed to create new and interesting (and usually hilarious) ways for them to die.

            Ah, yes. We had a Skull & Shackles pirate campaign where we kept a roster of lower-level crew members who would do Red Shirts tier missions when we didn’t have a full table. Lots of spoofs and goofs, and the main character cast didn’t have to lose sleep over getting eaten by a giant claim or seduced to the bottom of the sea by sexy merpeople.

    • yggstyle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      The important thing is you have discovered this and are comfortable with that knowledge. That in and of itself is a big deal.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Did religion get you there? I don’t recall anything about it in church. In fact they SERVED alcohol at my church.

      • Jikiya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t know about a lot of religions, but have so far only heard about Mormons banning coffee. Everything else seems to apply to multiple (that I know of) except that. But might hear of another today, I’ll be one of the lucky 10,000.

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Congratulations, sincerely.

      I’ve been on the world since before I can remember. It used to be pretty fun, honestly, but I can tell it’s just eating my soul away bit by bit. Unless something changes soon there won’t be anything left.

      Tap for /s

      Just kidding, I hate this place. I really am happy for you though. It’s not easy.

      • thearch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        im an exmo, yeah that’s basically it. The “doctrine” we get that from says:

        And again, hot drinks are not for the body or belly.

        this was “interpreted” as caffeine specifically, probably because the cult leaders didn’t want to give up hot cocoa.

    • can@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Mormons aren’t allowed hot drinks. I wonder if anyone’s made an exception for cold brew.

  • Mabel [She/Fae/Its]@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Don’t forget: Science fiction

    Fast food (and while it’s bad for you, I’m not gonna die from having it once dude)

    Video games (especially Pokemon)

    All of these things were seen as bad around the people I grew up with. But, even my mom realised it was mostly bullshit and let me play Pokemon.

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My ex-mother outlaw wouldn’t do yoga because she thought it was a religion or witchcraft or something (ETA: and thus thought it imperiled her eternal soul because she might pick up some beliefs) and she was a mainline Baptist so yeah, yoga.

      • Hugin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I know it’s a typo but an ex-mother outlaw who won’t do yoga sounds pretty cool. “In a world where yoga was required by law. She said no. Rated R”

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Not a typo, actually. She’s my ex mother outlaw because I never married my ex, her other title is “my kids grandma”. She is great, though has the oddball conservative ideas you’d expect for an old person. Like the yogaphobia.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        thought it was a religion

        It absolutely started as a religious practice. There are various forms of yoga that are used as mediation practices in Hinduism.

        That said, Westerners almost never practice yoga that way. They’ll sprinkle in a generous helping of, “namaste” but they’re basically doing it as a form of light exercise.

        It’s like if a bunch of Indians saw a Catholic ceremony and said, “That’s a pretty good workout. Stand up, sit down, kneel, sit, kneel, stand. It’s not a religious thing, I just go to mass for leg day.”

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It is technically part of a repressive religion itself so the placement in the list does seem a bit odd to me, but the nuance is that nonpractitioners can use it to stretch and exercise without any spiritualism.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah I realized after writing that, it’s a little flippant. My favorite yoga teacher once described American yoga as an unholy mashup of British calisthenics and ancient Indian spiritual and contemplative practices, and that sounds about right. I do know it’s orientalist, and that’s problematic, but goodness it is a great physical practice, the way we do it here.

        • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think I read that originally yoga was a mental and physical practice that later on had all these layers of religiosity added. Someone more knowledgeable feel free to correct me.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            originally hindu meditation for seeking… well… I’m not sure I understand it.

            in the modern era there’s both the traditional, religious yoga, and the people doing it for generic mindfulness and physical fitness. it’s also in Jainism and Buddhism, but it started in hinduism.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The church I grew up in offered “yoga style stretching class” that did not have any heathen influences like gongs or deep breathing or Sanskrit names for stuff, was separated by gender, did not allow yoga pants or bare midriffs and avoided any postures that flaunted the privates. You know… to avoid giving Satan™ a foothold in your nether bits.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          do be fair, their church probably has a fair number of predators that… uh… well. look, don’t ask why they just don’t get rid of the creep, s’okay?

          • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_stair

            The missing stair is a metaphor for a person within a social group or organization who many people know is untrustworthy or otherwise has to be “managed,” but around whom the group chooses to work by discreetly warning newcomers of their behavior, rather than address the person and their behavior openly. The “missing stair” in the metaphor refers to a dangerous structural fault, such as a missing step in a staircase; a fault that people may become used to and quietly accepting of, that is not openly signposted or fixed, and that newcomers to a group or organization are warned about discreetly.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hundreds of millions of people “abuse” alcohol casually and live long, full lives.

      Tarot on the other hand gives you some kind of turbocancer brain damage if you engage with it more than once, as if it’s more than a curious novelty.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That dying in a car accident is more likely than dying for alcohol reasons (could often be both, of course).

          • nednobbins@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            I was looking around and that seems to be a US specific statistic.

            Worldwide, auto accidents don’t make it into the top 10.

              • nednobbins@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Interesting.

                It looks like you’re right on traffic deaths. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_traffic-related_death_rate The US (12.9) is actually a little below average on traffic related deaths compared to the global average per 100,000 (16.7).

                It looks like the discrepancy comes from how different statistics interpret alcohol related deaths. The Wikipedia article I linked to initially, uses numbers from the Disease Control Priorities report https://www.dcp-3.org/ that counts underlying risk factors. That may be a high estimate and there’s some variation in how people talk about alcohol related deaths (eg fully vs partially attributable to alcohol https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7308a1.htm)

                So if you look at just deaths that are fully attributable to alcohol are 51,665 but deaths that are at least partially attributable to alcohol are at 178,000). Some of those traffic deaths are included. Around 11,000 traffic fatalities a year are attributed to drunk driving (https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/car/car-crash-statistics/#leading-causes-of-fatal-car-accidents).

                It makes sense now that I think about it. It’s easy to tell when someone’s been in a vehicle crash and whether or not it was fatal. There’s a whole continuum of how much alcohol someone can consume and how much of a problem it is for them. It’s pretty obvious if they die from acute alcohol poisoning but if their alcohol use weakened their immune system and they die of COVID, how do we categorize it?

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I, too, am disappointed by the lack of D&D on this infographic. Plus it needs more Ozzy.