I am using unattended-upgrades across multiple servers. I would like package updates to be rolled out gradually, either randomly or to a subset of test/staging machines first. Is there a way to do that for APT on Ubuntu?

An obvious option is to set some machines to update on Monday and the others to update on Wednesday, but that only gives me only weekly updates…

The goal of course is to avoid a Crowdstrike-like situation on my Ubuntu machines.

edit: For example. An updated openssh-server comes out. One fifth of the machines updates that day, another fifth updates the next day, and the rest updates 3 days later.

    • Last@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I didn’t run it, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there was an invalid option in it somewhere. Ansible Lightspeed would be a better tool than what I used, but it’s sufficient to get the point across.

      • remram@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        What was “the point”? From my perspective, I had to correct a fifth post about using a schedule, even though I had already mentioned it in my post as a bad option. And instead of correcting someone, turns out I was replying to a bot answer. That kind of sucks, ngl.

        • Last@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          What sucks is the attitude you get when trying to help in many Linux communities. It’s a tool, and a very useful one too.

          If you knew what you were doing, you could understand the loop just by looking at it, without having to run it, ngl.

          • remram@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I feel you, but on the other hand if every single community member tries to help, even if they have no idea or don’t understand the question, this is not great.

            Anybody can ask Google or an LLM, I am spending more time reading and acknowledging this bot answer than it took you to copy/paste. This is the inverse of helping.

            The problem is not “the loop”(?), your (LLM’s) approach is not relevant, and I’ve explained why.