• Firipu@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean, I know lemmy has an open source hardon and hates anything walled, but is this really such a bad thing? Google is getting rid of a bunch of shitty apps and risky apps. Nothing is stopping you from still sideloading them if you really need them.

    I really fail to see the actual issue aside from “google bad”

    • undrwater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Did you read the article? Simple text and PDF readers are in the cross hairs. Apps that aren’t “engaging” are in the cross hairs.

      I expect developers of perfectly fine apps will have to manually vet those apps with Google.

      • Firipu@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, I read it. Didn’t think much of it. Are those apps that common? Don’t use them, as my browser can read pdf and text files.

        Sounds more like some fringe apps will get caught in the cross hairs. Still sounds like a good change for the average end user. For the average power user, it won’t make a difference imo.

          • Firipu@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ofcourse not, I also use fdroid and I sideload a shitton of apps. But Google is not killing off alternate stores, they’re just making their store safer. My whole point is that this change is not that negative. If anything it’ll have a positive effect on non tech savvy users. It’ll save me time by potentially causing less issues on the devices of family members.