Sure it is. The possibility that my teenage daughter was a genocidal maniac was not a viable one. And if you claim it is: Name one genocidal maniac 14-year-old. Go for it. And no, not “Hitler was 14 once,” because that is not what I said or what you said “maybe so” about. I want to hear about a genocidal maniac who was one at age 14. Since you think that’s a possibility
I mean really… If you’re going to insult a child, at least be honest about it.
I mean really… If you’re going to insult a child, at least be honest about it.
I did not. I said maybe so. Because again I have no clue.
But you know all to well, that I don’t believe its likely, most children, regardless of how cruel or kind their parents may be- are inherently kind(same with most adults).
I said maybe so. That’s not agreeing. Its saying maybe. I don’t know so I can’t say one way or the other. Stop putting words in my mouth.
Nice weasel words there, Mr. Masochist.
… Its not weasel to say what I said.
Sure it is. The possibility that my teenage daughter was a genocidal maniac was not a viable one. And if you claim it is: Name one genocidal maniac 14-year-old. Go for it. And no, not “Hitler was 14 once,” because that is not what I said or what you said “maybe so” about. I want to hear about a genocidal maniac who was one at age 14. Since you think that’s a possibility
I mean really… If you’re going to insult a child, at least be honest about it.
There are a fair few to pick from on this list
I did not. I said maybe so. Because again I have no clue.
But you know all to well, that I don’t believe its likely, most children, regardless of how cruel or kind their parents may be- are inherently kind(same with most adults).
None of those children committed genocide. Nice dishonesty there to evade the fact that you insulted a child.
I did not, also, genocidal !== committed genocide.
More weaseling. You really do have an honesty problem.