• Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think the debate in that is passive vs active rather than just using technology. If the Hoover Dam were to become inoperable, would residents of Las Vegas be able to survive? And if it’s questionable what does aid, or worse a middle of the desert mass evacuation, even consist of? And this avoids even discussing current residents who in the face of increasing temperatures and energy prices may not be able to keep up with cooling needs.

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, absolutely. That would be an instant massive humanitarian disaster. I was more trying to respond to this though:

      just pointing out that since the first human put an animal skin over their shoulders we’ve been developing technology to live in places that we’d otherwise not be able to exist in.

      I think there is a big difference between the passive warming / cooling of clothing vs the huge energy requirement, spent resources and emissions required to basically run your entire home / office / factory / hotel as a giant fridge.

      Essentially going through some of the ancient technologies used for cooling buildings.

    • dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If the Hoover Dam becomes inoperable, the entire Southwest US is in trouble. It provides water for farms and power, both mostly in California. Las Vegas would actually be the last to feel the effects of Lake Mead drying up because they’ve installed a deeper “straw” to draw water from, along with a pumping station.

      https://www.snwa.com/where-southern-nevada-gets-its-water/our-regional-water-system/intake-no-3.html