• Ukrainian forces launched a surprise offensive into Russia’s Kursk region last Tuesday.
  • They have captured around 1,000 square kilometers of Russian land so far, Kyiv’s top general said.
  • That figure is almost as much territory as Russia has seized in Ukraine this year.
  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its actually amazing how much of a cluster fuck the start of ww2 was. Bringing back horses after inventing the tank 20 years before and using it ti win ww1 levels of intelligence.

    This is asinine. Horses were extremely useful in WWII. Try watching less Hollywood movies.

    One of the reasons Germans were so successful in their “lightning warfare” - they used horses which simplified logistics tremendously. A truck is no good if you don’t have fuel, and fuel supplies have been cut. A horse can just eat grass and drink water.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        These are different applications.

        And I wasn’t going to argue against bicycles having been extremely useful.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      When did the Germans use horses as offensive cavalry in WW2?

      You can clearly find references of French and the British dragging their heels in the interwar years because presumably the posh boys want their horses.

      You don’t know what you are on about. What Hollywood movies are there about army modernisation in the interwar period you think I am watching? I’ll actually enjoy watching it.

      • mars296@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        The person you replied to is not talking about cavalry. Horses were used by the Germans for moving men and equipment.

        • Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I know. But I made the original comment and I wasn’t on about horses being used for moving men and equipment. I was talking about them being used instead of tanks.

          Okay. Horses were used to move men and equipment. How is that related to my original point?

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Okay. Horses were used to move men and equipment. How is that related to my original point?

            Dragoons are cavalry. That’s how.

            Yes, it’s obvious they wouldn’t use lancers. Even in WWI cavalry charges are a thing of post-war (Soviet, Polish, maybe others’) propaganda much more than of actual use.