• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’d think with current battery tech we wouldn’t need the overhead wire anymore.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Batteries are heavy and expensive. A wired power source is so much more efficient for rail it’s barely worth discussing.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        And have a much shorter lifespan than catenary wire or third rail.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      The best use of a battery on a train is a small one to handle junctions. You disconnect from the wire at the end of one set, go through the junction, and then reconnect at the other side. Saves a lot of ugly spaghetti wiring.

      Otherwise, no, just use wires.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        You don’t even need that. Every electric train I know of has pickups on each car, and any break in the catenary or third rail is short enough that it can be bridged naturally by two cars, or sometimes even just one, if it has pickups at both ends.