• Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      The 2010 style graphics would also be cheaper today, as you could get away with less optimisations and tweaks.

    • JakJak98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      BLUF: Agreed. Games don’t need realism to be fun. They need fun to be fun.

      Aside from obvious genres like simulators, horror, or other niche games, graphics don’t, and shouldn’t be, the main focus of a game.

      It could just be plain fun. I’d prefer games with a bunch of sandbox niche mechanics than seeing a tree in 4k upscale. Like Noita or Terraria.

      Or a deep story. The original Talos Principle was alright on its graphics at the time, but it prioritized the story and puzzles. It was a fundamental game that shaped many of the philosophies I hold still today.

      Graphics can be important, but I’d also prefer stylized over realistic any day. That’s why some of the older games still hold up today, graphically.

      Wind Waker, the old 3d mario games, Bioshock, Oblivion (terrain, not people lol)

      All had really really solid art. And it still looks good. Because it didn’t try to push the limits on making the game look real.

      Back when Modern Warfare 2 released on the 360, I saw little dust clouds, and thought that it was the greatest game for realism ever at the time. The graphics were so good. Going back? Dogwater.