The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoIt seems like the logical way to worklemmy.worldimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down10
arrow-up126arrow-down1imageIt seems like the logical way to worklemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-squarekamen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoIt’s logical if you’re the user. Imagine how for every one user doing this deliberately there are nine who pause a video and forget it in the background, wasting bandwidth in the process.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 months agoIs bandwith that expensive nowadays? I feel the argument is valid but was implemented when bandwidth was way more expensive. I mean, if I upgrade my home internet box to the 40€ tier I’ll have 10Gb symmetrical. Edit: there are a lot of google fanbois here lol
minus-squaresigezayaq@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 months agoIt’s not about your bandwidth, it’s about YouTube’s bandwidth. You probably don’t care, but for them it adds up to a lot
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoI just showed how inexpensive it has become. Do you think I think I’m youtube??
It’s logical if you’re the user.
Imagine how for every one user doing this deliberately there are nine who pause a video and forget it in the background, wasting bandwidth in the process.
Is bandwith that expensive nowadays? I feel the argument is valid but was implemented when bandwidth was way more expensive.
I mean, if I upgrade my home internet box to the 40€ tier I’ll have 10Gb symmetrical.
Edit: there are a lot of google fanbois here lol
It’s not about your bandwidth, it’s about YouTube’s bandwidth. You probably don’t care, but for them it adds up to a lot
I just showed how inexpensive it has become.
Do you think I think I’m youtube??