• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not really. The only word in that whole tweet which is technically incorrect is “already”

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      The moon doesn’t produce light, it is reflecting sunlight, so in my opinion the first statement is incorrect

      • bisby@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        But if the moon wasn’t there, there would be no light reflected. Doesn’t matter the source, we have light at night because of the moon

          • bisby@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I would hope the whole thing is a joke in general.

            “The sun gives us light when it’s ‘already’ bright” is where the real logic breaks down. “I don’t need <thing> because I already have <benefit from thing>” is circular logic.

            So of course we wouldn’t have sunlight at night without the sun. but we also wouldn’t have sunlight at night without the moon.

            Whether we want to call it “more useful” than the sun… it is just as useful as the sun at night. We need both of them for the system to work. I was just trying to snarkily emphasize that we shouldn’t downplay the moon because it is “just” reflecting sunlight.