• Deello@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Recent events have taught me that only individual chats are encrypted*. Group chats don’t have that feature.

      • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        In telegram nothing is e2e encrypted unless you specifically ask it to be and when you do, it kills all the functionality that makes it better than others.

        • Deello@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s what I said. The person I replied to said that all messages are encrypted* with the asterisk being only if you specifically enable it. I clarified that it doesn’t apply to group chats though. I don’t use Telegram so the loss of functionality is actually a bigger deal to me than the argument around E2EE. Can you explain what features are lost when you enable it? It’s a messaging app so I’m curious what you sacrifice for E2EE.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Telegram groups are not E2E.

      Chats are encrypted, but the servers hold the encryption keys (I believe).

      There are one-to-one chats that are full e2e, but you have to enable it. And it has all sorts of compromises.

      Qualifier: this is as dicumented by telegram. Since it’s not open source, we can’t really verify it

    • uzay@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is no point in encrypting a public group chat since anyone can join and decrypt it anyway.