Patrick Breyer (@[email protected])
digitalcourage.social
🇬🇧🚨#ChatControl is back on the agenda: As soon as next Wednesday representatives of EU governments will resume work based on a secret document. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/public-register/public-register-search/?DocumentNumber=12319%2F24 This is what you can do now to help: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/take-action-to-stop-chat-control-now/ Update: Wednesday's meeting will be on collecting "guidance for further work" on #ChatControl - important! https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVII/EU/194992/imfname_11404502.pdf
  • Remavas@programming.devEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    I mean, ideally, you shouldn’t be able to submit a bill that not only goes against all (I’d hope) national constitutions, but also violates fundamental rights as established by the European Court of Justice.

    But oh well, let’s hope that we can stop this before it becomes law, and if it does, that its implementation gets delayed enough for a hopefully sane judiciary to strike this down.

    • Rayspekt@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      3 months ago

      you shouldn’t be able to submit a bill that not only goes against all (I’d hope) national constitutions

      I strongly disagree. That would put EU in a deadlock. It is important that new regulation may be passed top-down to improve legislation in all states.

      • Remavas@programming.devEnglish
        1·
        3 months ago

        I tend to align my personal view largely with the German decision in Solange I/II; as long as the EU provides the same protection of fundamental rights as the national constitution (Grundgesetz in germany’s case), it supercedes review under national constitutional courts.

        My point here was that they’re pushing a bill that clearly goes against fundamental rights recognized by national constitutions and EU law.

        edit: I presume you have in mind the recent-ish controversy with Poland. I’ll agree with you that that one is counterproductive.