• leisesprecher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Or at least reasonable.

    It’s perfectly reasonable for, say, a tattoo artist not to be liable for the medical bills, if the ink causes a hitherto unknown allergy to kick in.

    It’s not reasonable to argue that a streaming service agreement covers liability for being cut in half by a train.

    There has to be a reasonable understanding of the underlying risks that are covered. Some things are just inherently risky, and if the buyer knows and understands that, she can agree on taking that risk. Otherwise, no doctor would ever touch any patient ever again.