It just made my morning to see that not only is the AP reporting this correctly, but the headline explicitly states the insane rarity of voter fraud. (Non-citizen or otherwise.) You have a better chance of getting a clear picture of Bigfoot than you do of having a voter fraud incident in your jurisdiction.
No. I’m not your brother in Christ. In both that I couldn’t care less about some fictitious “Christ” and that I have no relation to you.
Congrats? you’ve proved my point? Non-Zero amount happens… How is that detected? And why would it be beneficial to be harder to make to make that detection?
You stated yourself that some do occur. Which is it?
If this was literal murder… a relatively rare event… do we want to make it harder to catch the murderers? Why is this mentality only around voting not applied elsewhere?
You’re failing to understand the premise here… If it happens so little that it doesn’t matter, then why relax the standard? It’s clearly working. You spook people who think it could happen when you do that. There’s no positive to doing that. So why do it?
watch out you dont cut yourself on that edge
What a great and insightful comment.
what a coincidence, i felt the same about yours
Disenfranchisement is an invalid solution to a problem that effectively does not exist.
Nothing disenfranchising about unlinking 2 completely different systems that really shouldn’t have been linked to begin with. Licensing drivers and voting together automatically doesn’t make sense if you’re granting licenses to those who aren’t eligible to vote…