Wilshire@lemmy.world to Space@lemmy.world · 3 months agoFor the first time in more than three years, SpaceX misses a booster landingarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square1fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkFor the first time in more than three years, SpaceX misses a booster landingarstechnica.comWilshire@lemmy.world to Space@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square1fedilink
minus-squareflauschtier@feddit.orglinkfedilinkDeutscharrow-up1·3 months agoIt is impressive that the landings got so reliable that a failed landing is worth a headline, but the „boring“ successful Falcon9 landing are not. (At least not as the main topic)
It is impressive that the landings got so reliable that a failed landing is worth a headline, but the „boring“ successful Falcon9 landing are not. (At least not as the main topic)