• MrEff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Biggest argument people are going to have against this is reading the headline and then realizing most their retirement is in the form of unrealized gains. But if you then just read the qualifier of $100 million, you will quickly realize we are not talking about normal people here. We aren’t even talking about normal rich people. We are talking about the 1% of 1% people.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Government has never expanded their reach when given power. Civil forfeiture was about combating organized crime not funding police departments. Border patrol has expanded reasonable searches from crossings to cover entire states. Give it 20 year and this will apply to gains over a million.

      • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I mean… oh no? A million is still wildly more than any one human needs or should have so who gives a shit if they tax it. Also unsure if a retirement fund would exactly count as tradable assets anyways. But also, if we accidentally manage to kill the fucking stock market because of this in only two years that be fucking cool as hell lol.

      • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, and because of this the corporate tax rate and top marginal tax rate has been trending up for the past half century… right?