No comments or anything, just lots of Downvotes.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. People disagree on the bias bot reporting
    2. People don’t like their biases being made visible
    3. People don’t realize they have a bias
    4. People find the bot noisy
  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m mostly in favor of leaving the comment-clogging bots back on reddit where they can all talk to each other without me.

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not sure if this is the same on every instance, but on my profile there’s an option for “show bot accounts”

      Just uncheck that bad boy and self-identified bot accounts don’t even show up.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it’s biased itself. They whitewash far right conservative sources while listing anything that tries to remain neutral and fact based as having a left bias. Left center to be exact. Then they put far right stuff in “right center” to make you think it’s equivalent.

    Their factual rating is largely subjective as well. With similar amounts of failed fact checks getting different ratings.

    So basically the guys who want to be the guardians of fact and bias are themselves acting in a biased manner instead of an objective one.

    • Dramatic Shitposter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because it’s biased itself. They whitewash far right conservative sources while listing anything that tries to remain neutral and fact based as having a left bias. Left center to be exact. Then they put far right stuff in “right center” to make you think it’s equivalent.

      Source?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can check the categories on the MBFC website yourself but a couple choice picks in the “right center” category are the Ayn Rand Institute, advocates for self governance, and American Action Network.

        The first two are libertarian and pro Anarcho Capitalism. The second one attempts to masquerade as a non political education tool about politics. And third is a partisan group that runs campaign ads for the GOP.

        Meanwhile in left center we have NYT, WAPO, and BBC.

        • Dramatic Shitposter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You can check the categories on the MBFC website yourself but a couple choice picks in the “right center” category are the Ayn Rand Institute, advocates for self governance, and American Action Network.

          The first two are libertarian and pro Anarcho Capitalism. The second one attempts to masquerade as a non political education tool about politics. And third is a partisan group that runs campaign ads for the GOP.

          Meanwhile in left center we have NYT, WAPO, and BBC.

          Looking through all the sources you mentioned, especially the center-right sources, the ratings tend to be accurate. Did you expect the center right sources to be rated as far right and the center left sources to be rated as right wing?

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I expect the fact based objective sources to be rated as center/not biased. And sources calling for a complete destruction of liberal democracy to be far right, yes. The campaign site should be listed under Right as it’s transparently a partisan organization.

            The comparison with leftists here would be if they listed Anarcho-Communists as “left center”. But then your response tells me everything I need to know. You’ve gone right into exaggerated rhetoric meant to paint me as someone from the far left.

            • Dramatic Shitposter@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              You’ve gone right into exaggerated rhetoric meant to paint me as someone from the far left.

              Your response tell me everything I need to know, that you’re the average far left Lemming that sees everyone you disagree with as a far right incel.