I’ll start by acknowledging that this isn’t my idea, credit to Sam Harris. I also don’t know if this is even controversial, but I figured this would be a better place to post than in Showerthoughts.

By consciousness, I mean the subjective experience of what it feels like to be. As philosopher Thomas Nagel put it:

‘An organism has conscious mental states if and only if there is something that it is like to be that organism—something it is like for the organism.’

It’s at least conceivable that things like free will, the self, or even the entire universe could be an illusion. For all we know, we could be living in a simulation and nothing might be real. Even if you don’t believe that, there’s still a greater-than-zero chance you could be wrong. However, this doesn’t apply to consciousness itself. Even if everything is just a hallucination, it remains an undeniable fact that it feels like something to hallucinate. To claim that consciousness could be an illusion is a self-contradictory statement as consciousness is where illusions appear.

    • theilleists@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is the only absolute truth, for each of us. I may be a brain in a vat being fed false stimuli. I may be in a grand computer simulation. I may be a resident of Plato’s Cave. Everything I believe or guess about the world around me may be an illusion. But I do know that I think, and therefore, in some sense, I am.

      • ContrarianTrail@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The part I take issue with this is the “I” or “self”. That, I argue is an illusion. There is no centre to consciousness. There’s just consciousness. The correct saying would be “thinking is occuring”

        • theilleists@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Of course, you can think of consciousness as analogous to excitation of a field, and, like the electromagnetic field or gravitational field, there is no center, and everything is interconnected. And yet, like every particle is ultimately a wave in disguise, we can still meaningfully talk about individual particles, because some waves do behave that way sometimes.

          An individual consciousness is particle-like. As a shorthand for “this relatively independent packet of consciousness which has measurable distinctiveness from other packets and does not freely share perceptions or memories with them,” it’s often more practical just to say “I” instead.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The part I take issue with this is the “I” or “self”.

          Well learn Latin then. It just translates poorly into English.

          A more literal translation of “Cogito ergo sum” would be “consciousness, thus, existence”